One of the common false claims being made is that the Arctic sea ice has made a full recovery. The truth is that it is not even close. The 2013 melt season saw a large rebound (approximately 60%) over the 2012 melt season. However, that rebound was from an exceptionally low year. The minimum sea ice extent in 2012 was so low it was shocking. A large rebound from almost nothing is still a small amount overall. Then, the 2014 minimum extent was smaller than the 2013 and approximately 40% below the 1980 level (which was large). The trend line is very clear, the Arctic sea ice extent is decreasing. Still, the claims come in, mostly by people that don't want to bother with the facts.
But, there has been a trend over the last few years that is very difficult for anyone to deny - oil businesses are moving into the Arctic Region. This would not be possible with previous ice extent. The only way it is at all possible to erect drilling rigs in the Arctic is if the ice is melting away. If you set-up on top of the ice, the drifting ice would tear you away from the drill hole. It would not be possible to get a ship through the ice to drill and, even if you did, the drifting ice would push the ship out of position. For the same reason, it would not be possible to erect a drilling platform. The ice would demolish it. The Arctic Ocean, on average, is about 1000 meters deep (about 3200 feet) with a maximum depth of 5500 meters (18,000 feet). The deep parts of the ocean are too deep for a platform, but the shallow areas could accommodate one, but only in the absence of massive, drifting ice flows. If millions of tons of moving ice hit a platform, the ice is going to win.
But, wait. Companies are actually drilling up there and making claims so they can drill in the future. The U.S., Norway, Denmark, Canada and Russia have all made claims to ownership of some part of the Arctic Ocean basin. Denmark and Russia have claimed ownership of the North Pole itself.
So, if it is impossible to drill in the Arctic Ocean with ice present, why are the companies drilling? Clearly, claims the ice extent is fully recovered are all wrong. And, that makes you wonder about the motive for people to make claims that are obviously false.
Home
»
Arctic
»
climate
»
Sea Ice
»
Warming
» If Arctic Sea Ice Is Recovering, Why Is Everyone Claiming Arctic Ownership?
Saturday, 20 December 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
The weather is getting more extreme. This is a fact, no matter how many times certain people try to deny it. Last year alone, there was abou...
-
Honorable President-Elect Trump: By the end of the present century, 2100, man-made global warming could be a major existential threat to hu...
-
Anyone following the current events associated with the science of climate change should be aware of how the fossil fuel industry funds the ...
-
The Trump camp has long been rattling the saber when it comes to environmental regulation and climate change. Donald Trump himself famously ...
-
FOURIER The greenhouse effect is claimed 1,2 to have been suggested in 1824 by Jean Baptiste Joseph Fourier (1768 – 1830) 3 . In France i...
-
I began a new blog that will serve as a clearing house of articles on Tom Harris, ICSC and is affiliates. I will continue to add references ...
-
Summary: President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team for the Department of Energy has submitted a detailed questionnaire to the Depar...
-
Author: Robert Engelman Throughout the first decade of the 21st century, the world has continued to add the equivalent of a ...
-
Tom Harris, the paid shill of the fossil fuel industry , wrote a letter to the editor of the Des Moines Register, Coal plays essential role ...
-
Summary: Exxon’s scientists conducted extensive research in the 1970’s and 1980’s showing that use of fossil fuels produces greenhouse gases...

0 comments:
Post a Comment