One of the revisionist statements I frequently hear from deniers is that contrary scientists are persecuted by the government and that all you have to do to get funding is to say you are researching climate change. Apparently, in their interpretation of science funding, the government is in a grand conspiracy with climate scientists and will throw unlimited amounts of money at anyone willing to publish anything supporting the company line. When I point out that much of the science they object to was actually done during the Bush administration and that administration actively worked to suppress climate change research I typically receive a very strong denial of that. The Bush Administration, I am told, was a very strong supporter of climate change research and never did anything against climate scientists.
I'm not making this up. I wish I was, but this is an example of just how the denier industry is manipulating public opinion. If they say it, there are people that will believe it and repeat it. Of course, the record speaks for itself and clearly shows that administration did, in fact, actively suppress climate scientists.
Now, sadly, Rick Piltz, the man that blew the whistle on this campaign, recently passed away. He not only exposed how the White House was actively working to suppress any science, including climate science, that disagreed with the party line, but he also founded the website Climate Science Watch.
The story was reported by The New York Times on June 8, 2005. Evidence that was leaked included White House documents that actually had hand-written edits by White House officials. He also revealed the main person behind the effort was Philip Cooney. Cooney came to the administration by way of the American Petroleum Institute, which is a fossil fuel funded group, and was hired to coordinate the government's reports on climate change. Cooney left the White House two days after being exposed and went to work for ExxonMobil.
One of the amazing things is how Piltz predicted specific things that would impact the public and saw all of those predictions come true, including the flooding of the New York subways due to a storm surge. Yet, the fact that these things were accurately predicted in advance isn't something you read about. It is all just conveniently ignored.
So, the question remains, if climate science is a grand conspiracy of the government and climate scientists, why is it that much of the key research used to reach conclusions today was done when the White House actively worked to suppress any conclusions supporting climate change? And, don't try to say that the Bush administration did not try to suppress climate science. Rick Piltz showed just how wrong that statement is.
Monday, 27 October 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
The weather is getting more extreme. This is a fact, no matter how many times certain people try to deny it. Last year alone, there was abou...
-
Honorable President-Elect Trump: By the end of the present century, 2100, man-made global warming could be a major existential threat to hu...
-
Anyone following the current events associated with the science of climate change should be aware of how the fossil fuel industry funds the ...
-
The Trump camp has long been rattling the saber when it comes to environmental regulation and climate change. Donald Trump himself famously ...
-
FOURIER The greenhouse effect is claimed 1,2 to have been suggested in 1824 by Jean Baptiste Joseph Fourier (1768 – 1830) 3 . In France i...
-
I began a new blog that will serve as a clearing house of articles on Tom Harris, ICSC and is affiliates. I will continue to add references ...
-
Summary: President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team for the Department of Energy has submitted a detailed questionnaire to the Depar...
-
Author: Robert Engelman Throughout the first decade of the 21st century, the world has continued to add the equivalent of a ...
-
Tom Harris, the paid shill of the fossil fuel industry , wrote a letter to the editor of the Des Moines Register, Coal plays essential role ...
-
Summary: Exxon’s scientists conducted extensive research in the 1970’s and 1980’s showing that use of fossil fuels produces greenhouse gases...

0 comments:
Post a Comment