This issue was discussed this week at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). I found a particular statement to be rather frightening.
"If you look at production from 2000 to 2050, we basically have to produce the same amount of food as we produced in the last 500 years"
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-02-climate-hampering-world-food-production.html#jCp
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-02-climate-hampering-world-food-production.html#jCp
"If you look at production from 2000 to 2050 we basically have to produce the same amount of food as we produced in the last 500 years."The article also pointed out how we could solve this problem if we have enough time, maybe 1000 years. But we have only 10 to 20 years.
The fact is, global warming is not good for crops and we will be paying the price. Just look at the drought in California these last few years and the effect it has had on agriculture in that state.
Here are some other examples of the effects of global warming on crops:
Rising CO2 levels result in lower than expected yield increases.
Other studies indicate rising CO2 levels will result in a 2% yield reduction per decade.
Rising CO2 levels are harmful to rice, resulting in reduced crop yield.
Worldwide yields are already dropping.
Even if the yield goes up, the nutritional value will go down.
And, the forecast for American farmers is not good.
In the 50 years starting with 2000 we need to produce as much food as in the previous 500 years, and things aren't looking good.
"If you look at production from 2000 to 2050, we basically have to produce the same amount of food as we produced in the last 500 years"
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-02-climate-hampering-world-food-production.html#jCp
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-02-climate-hampering-world-food-production.html#jCp
0 comments:
Post a Comment